GOP presidential candidates say the science of climate change is settled

President Donald Trump on Tuesday called climate change a “phony” and “phony question” and argued that the scientific consensus on human-caused global warming is settled.

The remarks come amid a heated debate over the extent to which the federal government should be involved in the fight against climate change and the role of the private sector in the effort.

Trump and his Republican rivals have said the science is settled on climate change, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has already taken steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but the president has made no indication he plans to seek a broader role in regulating greenhouse gas pollution.

On Tuesday, Trump told a gathering of the Kansas Geological Survey that the “science is settled” on climate changes.

“The science is really settled on the fact that we are causing global warming, and we’ve had this for a long time,” Trump said.

“You see it every day.”

The president was speaking at a campaign rally for Kansas gubernatorial candidate Jason Pappas.

At least one Democratic presidential candidate, former Maryland Gov.

Martin O’Malley, has said he is open to a role in tackling the issue.

But Trump on Wednesday repeated his assertion that the science on climate is settled and said he believes climate change isn’t real.

“I’ve always believed in the science, I’ve always said the scientists are right,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One.

“But the real science is we’ve got a problem.

We’ve got to fix it.”

O’Malley’s spokeswoman, Andrea Miller, said Trump believes the science.

“While the president’s comments are certainly concerning, they do not represent his position on the science,” Miller said in a statement.

The Republican nominee also used the event to push back against the scientific community, saying he disagrees with a recent study that found global temperatures have warmed by 0.5 degrees Celsius in the past 100 years.

“I think the media has gone to extremes with their headlines, but we don’t need to go to extremes,” Trump insisted.

“You look at the number of degrees Fahrenheit, it’s the same amount of warming that’s happened in the last 50 years.”

Trump said he wants to cut emissions and is open for negotiations to reduce the nation’s greenhouse gas output.

“If we can make them work, we will.

We’re going to get this done,” Trump added.

On Monday, he said he didn’t agree with the U

Poll: The new Israeli government’s anti-Semitism fears have ‘become so acute’

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday said he wants to see “zero tolerance” for anti-Semitic views in his country.

Netanyahu’s remarks came after his cabinet announced on Sunday that they would ban the use of “any and all forms of anti-Semetic language” in public and in private, and “immediately” remove the country’s Jewish identity card, which would require a photo identification card.

The announcement followed a meeting between the cabinet, which also included Finance Minister Naftali Bennett, and the chief rabbinate, which is tasked with policing anti-Jewish sentiment.

Netanyahus’ new anti-anti-Semitism laws are part of an effort by the government to combat an increase in anti-Israel sentiment.

A new poll shows that almost half of Israelis oppose a ban on the cards, and that 67% of them believe that such legislation would “undermine the countrys unity.”

The cabinet decision to ban the cards was a “complete overreach,” Bennett told the Walla news agency.

Netayim Bennett and Bennett are seen as a powerful ally in Netanyahu’s governing coalition.

The two have clashed publicly over the last several months over how to handle the rising anti-Israeli sentiment in Israel.

Netahayim was among several cabinet ministers who voted against a bill that would have required a photo ID to vote in municipal elections, which were held last month.

Netanayim said that he did not oppose the move to ban such cards, but that it “would be an overreach” that would lead to the elimination of the country.

“It would be an extreme step.

It is against the spirit of the law, it is against our values, and it is not what we stand for,” Netanayin said.

Bennett, who has long called for a ban, also said he did think that the decision was “too much.”

“I don’t think we should allow a change to this law that will weaken the country and make us less united,” he said.

Netanya Bennett, the daughter of the Israeli prime minister, is a member of the ultra-Orthodox faction that is leading a push to push ahead with the legislation.

Netawit Bennett, a member and former head of the National Union of Israeli Citizens, is the leader of the Zionist Union, an influential religious party that has also opposed the ban.

Netatayim has vowed to fight the ban, saying it will “bring shame” on Israel and undermine the country “in the eyes of the world.”

Netanyal said the decision to impose the ban was not in line with the country ‘s values and will be a “sad day” for Israel.

“This is not the way the people of Israel will live.

We must stop this,” she said.

“This decision is not in the best interest of the nation, and Israel is in a desperate state.”